This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allmendinger, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory

University of Aberdeen, UK, p.allmendinger{at}abdn.ac.uk

The post-positivist domination of planning theory in recent years has rightly highlighted the social and political context of theories. Its impact through various guises including collaborative, postmodern and neo-pragmatic approaches has been significant. However, one area that has been immune to these broad changes and interpretations is typologies of planning. Typologies provide heuristics for academics and practitioners that help map the landscape of ideas that influence a particular field. As such they are crucial to any understanding of a diverse theoretical area such as planning. This article seeks to develop a post-positivist typology for planning theory. My typology is based upon the broad themes of post-positivism including the belief that all theory is to greater or lesser degrees normative, a non-linear conception of time and progress and the introduction of spatial and temporal variance in any understanding of the formulation, interpretation and application of theory. The result is an approach that does away with two traditional planning theory dualisms - the procedural-substantive distinction and the theory-practice gap. It also provides a locally diverse and unique interpretation of planning theory at the national and sub-national scale that rejects the idea that local interpretation of theories and their application can be assumed to be consistent with ideas operating at a higher (often supra-national) scale.

Key Words: collaborative • postmodern • post-positivism • procedural planning theory • typology

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Gunder Ideologies of Certainty in a Risky Reality: Beyond the Hauntology of Planning Planning Theory, July 1, 2008; 7(2): 186 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Rydin Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory Planning Theory, March 1, 2007; 6(1): 52 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder Shaping the Planner's Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning Education Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2004; 23(3): 299 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]