Planning Theory

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gunder, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Planning Theory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 225-248 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/147309520323005

Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning

Jean Hillier

University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Michael Gunder

University of Auckland, New Zealand

This article examines Lacan’s psychoanalytically derived social theory as to its appropriateness for understanding aspects of planning practice. Lacan theorized not only about language and culture, but also about that which resides outside of symbolization and underlies human desire, to provide an understanding of human subjectivity, identity and motivation. We discuss how a Lacanian critical social theoretical approach could be pertinent to analysis of the complex mixture of hybrid processes – technical, collaborative and political – that comprise planning development assessment. We outline key Lacanian concepts including the mirror-stage, jouissance, the Four Discourses and the ‘big Other’ and their applicability to understanding development assessment and regulation.

Key Words: development approval planning • discourse • Lacan • planning theory • psychoanalysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
A. Roy
Post-Liberalism: On the Ethico-Politics of Planning
Planning Theory, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 92 - 102.
[PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
M. Gunder
The Production of Desirous Space: Mere Fantasies of the Utopian City?
Planning Theory, July 1, 2005; 4(2): 173 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
P. Allmendinger and M. Gunder
Applying Lacanian Insight and a Dash of Derridean Deconstruction to Planning's 'Dark Side'
Planning Theory, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 87 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Gunder
Shaping the Planner's Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning Education
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2004; 23(3): 299 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]