This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allmendinger, P. Articles by Gunder, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Applying Lacanian Insight and a Dash of Derridean Deconstruction to Planning’s ‘Dark Side’

University of Reading, UK

Michael Gunder

University of Auckland, New Zealand

The critique of planning’s ‘dark’ side has been a theme of both modern and postmodern perspectives. While a great deal of anecdotal and empirical evidence exists that highlights how planning can be, and has been, used for nefarious ends there are few theoretical insights or understandings of the role of different actors, institutions or processes. This article provides a critical analysis of the notion of ‘dark side’ from a Lacanian and Derridean perspective. A short case study of the use of planning for what would broadly be regarded as ‘dark’ ends highlights a number of issues, particularly through engagement with Lacanian theory, which provides a useful theoretical framework for further research into the misuse of planning.

Key Words: dark side • enjoyment • fantasy • Lacan • repression

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Gunder Sustainability: Planning's Saving Grace or Road to Perdition? Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2006; 26(2): 208 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder The Production of Desirous Space: Mere Fantasies of the Utopian City? Planning Theory, July 1, 2005; 4(2): 173 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]