This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alfasi, N. Articles by Portugali, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Planning rules for a self-planned city

Ben Gurion University of the Negev and Tel Aviv University, Israel, nurital{at}bgu.ac.il

Juval Portugali

Ben Gurion University of the Negev and Tel Aviv University, Israel juval{at}post.tau.ac.il

Planning theory, laws, and systems are essentially procedural in that they focus on the process of planning and decision-making but do not deal with the substance of the decisions nor their impact on cities. They emphasize the role of the many (f)actors that shape the built environment rather than the resultant properties of the built environment itself. This is true both for the rational comprehensive theory of the 1960s and the 1990s postmodern theory of communicative planning theory. In this article we claim that current planning weaknesses, on the one hand, and viewing cities as complex self-organizing systems, on the other, require re-linking planning theory, law, and administration to the substantive qualitative relations between the various urban elements. We then introduce, first, an example for theorizing such an `Urban Code' that turns the spatial relations into a planning rule and, second, a suggestion for a planning system that is responsive to these qualitative relations and is capable of updating them.

Key Words: complexity • planning democracy • planning theory • urban code

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?