This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Portugali, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Learning From Paradoxes about Prediction and Planning in Self-Organizing Cities

Tel Aviv University, Israel, juval{at}post.tau.ac.il

Paradoxes have long been useful (and enjoyable) analytical tools; mainly due to their capability to expose things that are wrong when everything appears to be right. Zeno paradoxes are a good example of their use in antiquity, while in modern science theoretical physics stands as a domain where paradoxes are intensively used. This is not the case with cities and their planning, however. This article introduces paradoxes as useful means to study predictions in the context of cities and their planning. It discusses several city planning paradoxes and suggests seeing their origin in the complexity of cities and in the role played by cognitive maps and information exchange in complex, self-organizing cities.

Key Words: city planning • complexity • information theory • paradoxes • prospective cognitive maps • self-fulfilling/falsifying predictions

Planning Theory, Vol. 7, No. 3, 248-262 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1473095208094823


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?