This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brand, R. Articles by Gaffikin, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World

University of Manchester, UK, ralf.brand{at}manchester.ac.uk

Frank Gaffikin

Queen's University, Belfast, UK, f.gaffikin{at}qub.ac.uk

The purpose of this article is to expose the concept of collaborative planning to the reality of planning, thereby assessing its efficacy for informing and explaining what planners `really' do and can do. In this systematic appraisal, we begin by disaggregating collaborative planning into four elements that can enlighten such conceptual frameworks: ontology, epistemology, ideology and methodology. These four lenses help delimit and clarify the object of our examination and provide transparent criteria that guide our examination of collaborative planning's strengths and weaknesses. The second part of this article comprises an empirical investigation of planning processes in Northern Ireland, ranging from region-wide to local and from statutory to visionary. Planning efforts in this province make suitable test cases because special care has been invested in participatory deliberation processes to compensate for the democratic deficits in its mainstream political system. Such efforts have sought to ensure a maximally inclusive planning process. And indeed, the consultation process leading to the Regional Development Strategy, for example, has earned plaudits from leading exponents of collaborative planning. The final analysis provides a systematic gauge of collaborative planning in light of our empirical evidence, deploying the four conceptual dimensions introduced in the first part. This exposes a range of problems not only with the concept itself but also regarding its affinity with the uncollaborative world within which it has to operate. The former shed light on those aspects where collaborative planning as a conceptual tool for practitioners needs to be renovated, while the latter highlight inconsistencies in a political framework that struggles to accommodate both global competitiveness and local democratic collaboration.

Key Words: collaborative planning • epistemology • ideology • Northern Ireland • ontology • realistic assessment

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004) ` Strategic (Spatial) Planning Re-Examined ', Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 743—58 .
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P. and Kunzmann, K. (2003) ` Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe ', APA Journal 69(2): 113—29 .
• Amin, A. (2002) ` Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity ', Environment and Planning A 34(1): 959—80 .[CrossRef]
• Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Democracy for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press .
• Barker, K. (2006) Barker Review of Land Use Planning — Final Report — Recommendations. London: The Stationery Office , available online at [ www.barkerreviewofplanning.org.uk], accessed 18 January 2007.
• Barnes, B. and Bloore, D. (1982) `Rationality, Relativism and the Sociology of Knowledge ', in M. Hollis and S. Luke (eds) Rationality and Relativism, pp. 21—47. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
• Belfast City Vision Partnership Board (2001 ) Belfast City Vision: Our City, Our Future, Our Vision. Belfast: Belfast City Vision .
• BLSP (Belfast Local Strategy Partnership) ( 2004) Helping to Build a Sustainable City at Peace with Itself: Strategy Statement. Belfast: Belfast Local Strategy Partnership .
• Brand, R. (2005a) Synchronizing Science and Technology with Human Behaviour. London: Earthscan .
• Brand, R. (2005b) ` The Citizen-innovator ', The Innovation Journal 10(1): 9—19 .
• Calhoun, C. (ed.) (1991) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
• Coaffee, J. and Healey, P. (2003) ` "My Voice: My Place": Tracking Transformations in Urban Governance ', Urban Studies 40(10): 1979—99 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Davidoff, P. (1965) ` Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning ', Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(4): 331—7 .
• Deveaux, M. (2000) Cultural Pluralism and Dilemmas of Justice. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press .
• DRDNI (Department of Regional Development, Northern Ireland) (2001) Shaping Our Future: Regional Development Strategy for Northern Ireland 2025. Belfast: Department of Regional Development, Northern Ireland .
• Dryzek, J.S. (2003) `Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia', April, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra .
• DSDNI (Department of Social Development, Northern Ireland) (2005) People and Place: Reflections of a City: Public Realm Strategy for Belfast City Centre. Belfast: Department of Social Development, Northern Ireland .
• Elander, I. (2003) ` Between Efficiency and Democracy — Partnership in Urban Governance ', keynote speech at the Nordic Symposium Local Planning in Change: New Possibilities and Roles, Lillehammer, Norway, 14—16 August, available online at: [http://www.ks.no/upload/4342/p_elander.doc].
• Fainstein, S. (2000) ` New Directions in Planning Theory ', Urban Affairs Review 35(4): 451—78 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Flyvberg, B. (1996) `The Dark Side of Planning: Rationality and "Realrationalität" ', in S. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza and R. Burchell (eds) Explorations in Planning Theory, pp. 383—94. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Reseach, Rutgers University .
• Forester, J. (1996) `Beyond Dialogue to Transformative Learning: How Deliberative Rituals Encourage Political Judgment in Community Planning Processes ', in S. Esquith (ed.) Political Dialogue: Theories and Practices, pp. 295—333. Amsterdam / Atlanta, GA: Rodopi .
• Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press .
• Friedmann, J. (1993) ` Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning ', Journal of the American Planning Association 59(4): 482—5 .[CrossRef]
• Friends of the Earth (2006) ` Barker Planning Review Will Undermine Local Democracy Warns Friends of the Earth', press release, 4 December, available online at: [ http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/barker_planning_review_wil_04122006.html ], accessed 18 January 2007.
• Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (1993) ` Science for the Post-normal Age ', Futures 25(7): 739—55 .[CrossRef]
• Gaffikin, F. and Sweeney, P. (1995) Listening to People, Making Belfast Work. Belfast: Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland .
• Gaffikin, F., McEldowney, M. and Sterrett, K. (2000) Shaping Our Future: Public Consultation on a Regional Strategic Framework for Northern Ireland. London: The Stationery Office .
• Gaffikin, F., Morrissey, M., McEldowney, M. and Sterrett, K. (1997) Belfast City-Region: Public Voices. London: The Stationery Office .
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage .
• Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
• Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press .
• Giddens, A. and Diamond, P. (eds) (2005) The New Egalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
• Graham, S. and Healey, P. (1999) ` Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for Planning Theory and Practice ', European Planning Studies 7(5): 623—46 .
• Gunder, M. (2003) ` Passionate Planning for the Others' Desire: An Agonistic Response to the Dark Side of Planning ', Progress in Planning 60(3): 235—319 .[CrossRef]
• Harris, N. (2002) `Collaborative Planning — From Theoretical Foundations to Practice Forms', in P. Allmendinger and M. Tewdwr-Jones (eds) Planning Futures: New Directions in Planning Theory, pp. 21—43. London: Routledge .
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning — Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Houndmills and London: Macmillan .
• Healey, P. (1998) ` Collaborative Planning in a Stakeholder Society ', Town Planning Review 69(1): 1—22 .
• Healey, P. (2004a) ` Creativity and Urban Governance ', Policy Studies 25(2): 87—102 .[CrossRef]
• Healey, P. (2004b) Summary of Her Contribution to the Roundtable on Collaborative Planning and Democracy: Building Institutions of Governance for the Network Society, Association of European Schools of Planning 2004 Conference, Grenoble, 3 July 2004. Summary of Proceedings, available online at: [ http://www.csus.edu/ccp/CDN/ccp%20summary%20of%20AESOP%20Grenoble%20Roundtable.pdf ], accessed 16 November 2005.
• Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land Use Planning. London and New York: Routledge .
• Hillier, J. (2003) ` Agon'izing over Consensus — Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot Be "Real" ', Planning Theory 2(1): 37—59 .[Abstract]
• Honig, B. (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press .
• House of Commons (2002) `Planning, Competitiveness and Productivity — House Of Commons: Sessions 2002—03: Fourth Report', available online at: [http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1143471 ], accessed 18 January 2007.
• Hutchinson, J. and Smith, D.A. (eds) (1996) Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
• Innes, J. (1995) ` Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice ', Journal of Planning Education and Research 14(3): 183—90 .[CrossRef]
• Innes, J. (2004) ` Consensus Building — Clarifications for the Critics ', Planning Theory 3(1): 5—20 .[Abstract]
• Innes, J. and Booher, D. (1999) ` Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems — A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning ', APA Journal 65(4): 412—23 .
• Innes, J. and Booher, D. (2003) `The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity', Institute of Urban & Regional Development , IURD Working Paper Series, Paper WP-2003—03, available online at: [http://repositories.cdlib.org/iurd/wps/WP-2003—03 ], accessed 20 April 2006.
• Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House .
• Jenkins, S. (2006) ` This Is an Open Invitation to Developers to Try Their Luck ', The Guardian, 6 December, available online at: [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,,1964980,00.html ], accessed 18 January 2007.
• Kelly, R. (2006) Report of Kate Barker's Review of Land-Use Planning: Parliamentary written statement by Ruth Kelly, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, 5 December, available online at: [ http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1504902], accessed 18 January 2007.
• Lustick, I. (1993) Unsettled States: Displaced Lands. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
• Making Belfast Work (1995 ) Making Belfast Work: Strategy Statement. Belfast: Department of the Environment , Northern Ireland.
• Mantysalo, R. (2002) ` Dilemmas in Critical Planning Theory ', Town Planning Review 73(4): 417—36 .
• McEldowney, M. and Sterrett, K. (2001) ` Shaping a Regional Vision: The Case of Northern Ireland ', Local Economy 161: 38—49 .
• McEldowney, M., Sterrett, K. and Gaffikin, F. (2001) `Architectural Ambivalence: The Built Environment and Cultural Identity in Belfast', in W.J.V. Neill and H.-U. Schwedler (eds) Urban Planning and Cultural Inclusion: Lessons from Belfast and Berlin, pp. 100—17. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
• Milne, R. (2006) ` Barker Report Proposes Wide-ranging Reforms to Planning System ', Planning Portal News, 8 December, available online at: [http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/england/professionals/en/1115314671412.html ], accessed 18 January 2007.
• Moore, S.A. (2001) Technology and Place: Sustainable Architecture and the Blueprint Farm. Austin: University of Texas Press .
• Moore, S.A. (2007) Alternative Routes to the Sustainable City. Austin , Curitiba , and Frankfurt . Lanham, MD: Lexington .
• Mouffe, C. (1999) ` Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism ', Social Research 66(3): 745—58 .
• Mouffe, C. (2000) Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism , Political Science Series, No. 72. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies .
• Murtagh, B. (2004) ` Collaboration, Equality and Land Use Planning ', Planning Theory and Practice 5(4): 453—69 .[CrossRef]
• Neill, W.J.V. and Gordon, M. (2001) ` Shaping Our Future? The Regional Strategic Framework for Northern Ireland ', Planning Theory and Practice 2(1): 31—52 .[CrossRef]
• Nowotny, H. (1999) ` The Place of People in Our Knowledge ', European Review 7(2): 247—62 .
• Pennington, M. (2002) `A Hayekian Liberal Critique of Collaborative Planning ', in P. Allmendinger and M. Tewdwr-Jones (eds) Planning Futures: New Directions in Planning Theory, pp. 187—205. London: Routledge .
• Ploger, J. (2004) ` Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism ', Planning Theory 3(1): 71—92 .[Abstract]
• Prime Minister and the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1999) Modernizing Government. London: The Stationery Office Limited . Dd 5068746, 3/99, 77240, Job No. J0077695, available online at: [http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/moderngov/download/modgov.pdf].
• Rowley, A. (2006) `BSc Land Management — Programme Specification ', available online at: [http://www.rdg.ac.uk/cops/planningug.pdf ], accessed 9 July 2007.
• Sager, T. (2006) ` The Logic of Critical Communicative Planning: Transaction Cost Alteration ', Planning Theory 5(3): 223—54 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Sandercock, L. (ed.) (1998) Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History. Berkeley: University of California Press .
• Sandercock, L. (2000) ` When Strangers Become Neighbours: Managing Cities of Difference ', Planning Theory and Practice 1(1): 13—30 .[CrossRef]
• Sarkissian, W. (2005) ` Stories in a Park: Giving Voice to the Voiceless in Eagleby, Australia ', Planning Theory and Practice 6(1): 103—17 .[CrossRef]
• Schaap, A.W. (2006) ` Agonism in Divided Societies ', Philosophy and Social Criticism 32(2): 255—77 .[CrossRef]
• Schot, J. and Rip, A. (1996) ` The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment ', Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54(2—3): 251—68 . Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger P. (2002) ` Conclusion ', in[CrossRef]
• P. Allmendinger and M. Tewdwr-Jones (eds) Planning Futures: New Directions in Planning Theory, pp. 206—16. London: Routledge .
• Wissink, B. (1995) ` Advocacy and Counsel in Dutch Regional Planning — An Inescapable Tension ', paper to AESOP Congress, Glasgow, August.
• Ziman, J. (1994) Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Planning Theory, Vol. 6, No. 3, 282-313 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1473095207082036


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Umemoto and H. Igarashi Deliberative Planning in a Multicultural Milieu Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2009; 29(1): 39 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brand, R. Articles by Gaffikin, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?