This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hillier, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

`Agon'izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real'

Curtin University of Technology, Australia

I explore the core Habermasian concept of rational consensus-formation and its counterfactuality before introducing the possibility of permanence of conflict, non-reciprocity and domination (i.e. of agonism) which may productively explain some of the powergames enacted in planning decision-making. In so doing I draw on the concept of agonism and introduce the political into Habermas' moral theorization. Where the personal and the political intersect there is a role for psychology. I illustrate how Habermas' communicative theorizing was itself partly developed from a psychoanalytical tradition before introducing some of the concepts popularized by Jacques Lacan. I conclude that development of communicative planning theory could usefully retain some of Habermas' psychological foundations while turning to the work of Lacan as a basis for an enhanced understanding of the realities of planning practice.

Key Words: agonism • consensus • Habermas • Lacan

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Ploger Foucault's dIspositif and the City Planning Theory, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 51 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Roy Post-Liberalism: On the Ethico-Politics of Planning Planning Theory, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 92 - 102. [PDF]

				R. Brand and F. Gaffikin Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World Planning Theory, November 1, 2007; 6(3): 282 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder Sustainability: Planning's Saving Grace or Road to Perdition? Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2006; 26(2): 208 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hillier Straddling the Post-Structuralist Abyss: Between Transcendence and Immanence? Planning Theory, November 1, 2005; 4(3): 271 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder The Production of Desirous Space: Mere Fantasies of the Utopian City? Planning Theory, July 1, 2005; 4(2): 173 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Allmendinger and M. Gunder Applying Lacanian Insight and a Dash of Derridean Deconstruction to Planning's 'Dark Side' Planning Theory, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 87 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Innes Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics Planning Theory, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Ploger Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism Planning Theory, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 71 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder Shaping the Planner's Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning Education Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2004; 23(3): 299 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hillier and M. Gunder Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning Planning Theory, November 1, 2003; 2(3): 225 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]