• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.
Impact Factor:1.409 | Ranking:Planning & Development 20 out of 55
Source:2016 Release of Journal Citation Reports with Source: 2015 Web of Science Data

The suburbs as sites of ‘within-planning’ power relations

  1. Alan Mace
  1. The London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
  1. Alan Mace, The London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: a.mace{at}lse.ac.uk

Abstract

Despite a longstanding and varied body of literature on suburban difference, a simplified narrative of the suburbs persists that is represented by a city–suburb binary. This is damaging as it undermines our understanding of the social dynamics of the places in which, in the United Kingdom, the majority of the population live. This article looks at the reasons for the persistence of a city–suburb binary. It engages with suburban housing as a Bourdieuian field in order to show how simplified characterisations of the suburban serve the interest of particular groups, including within planning. Bourdieu’s field theory offers a powerful means to understand how judgements of the suburbs are naturalised and so become common-sense truths. As field theory indicates ‘within-planning’ power relations that support particular truths, it offers the possibility of challenging these by exposing the taken-for-granted norms of the city-suburb binary.

Article Notes

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

This Article

  1. Planning Theory 1473095214567027
    All Versions of this Article:
    1. Version of Record - Jul 12, 2016
    2. current version image indicatorOnlineFirst Version of Record - Jan 19, 2015
    What's this?
  1. References

Share